Value-Momentum on Indian Stocks: 15.69% CAGR Over 21 Years of NSE Data

Value-momentum composite on NSE from 2004 to 2025. 15.69% CAGR, 4,016% total return. 62% down capture, 110% up capture, 5.45% annual alpha vs Sensex.

Growth of $10,000 invested in Value-Momentum on NSE vs Sensex.

A value-momentum composite on India's National Stock Exchange returned 15.69% annually from 2004 to 2025, producing 4,016% total return. Compared to the Sensex, the portfolio captured 110% of upside while absorbing only 62% of the downside. That combination of participation and protection is uncommon for a systematic strategy.

Contents

  1. Method
  2. The Screen
  3. What We Found
  4. Key Observations
  5. Limitations
  6. Takeaway
  7. Part of a Series

We ran the backtest on NSE only, excluding BSE. Many Indian companies are listed on both exchanges. Including both would create duplicate positions in the same underlying business, inflating returns with an artificial diversification benefit that doesn't exist.

Data: FMP financial data warehouse, 2000–2025. Updated March 2026.


Method

Parameter Value
Universe NSE (National Stock Exchange)
Filters P/E 0-20, ROE > 10%, D/E < 1.0
Ranking 12-month momentum, composite percentile
Rebalancing Semi-annual (January, July)
Holding period 6 months
Max positions 30 stocks, equal weight
Cash rule Fewer than 10 qualifying stocks
Market cap > 20B INR (~$240M USD)
Data source FMP via Ceta Research warehouse
Execution Next-day close (MOC execution model)
Transaction costs Size-tiered (0.1-0.5% one-way)
Benchmark Sensex (^BSESN)
Period 2000-2025 (effective: 2004-2025)

This is based on the value-momentum composite described by Asness, Moskowitz, and Pedersen (2013). For the full methodology, see our US flagship post.

The Screen

-- Value-Momentum India (NSE) Screen
-- Run at: cetaresearch.com/data-explorer?q=bVPHsOKRsY

SELECT
    k.symbol,
    p.companyName,
    f.priceToEarningsRatioTTM as pe_ratio,
    k.returnOnEquityTTM * 100 as roe_pct,
    f.debtToEquityRatioTTM as debt_to_equity,
    k.marketCap / 1e9 as market_cap_billions
FROM key_metrics_ttm k
JOIN financial_ratios_ttm f ON k.symbol = f.symbol
JOIN profile p ON k.symbol = p.symbol
WHERE f.priceToEarningsRatioTTM > 0
    AND f.priceToEarningsRatioTTM < 20
    AND k.returnOnEquityTTM > 0.10
    AND f.debtToEquityRatioTTM >= 0
    AND f.debtToEquityRatioTTM < 1.0
    AND k.marketCap > 20e9
    AND p.exchange IN ('NSE')
ORDER BY f.priceToEarningsRatioTTM ASC
LIMIT 100

What We Found

Growth of $10,000 invested in Value-Momentum on NSE vs Sensex from 2000 to 2025.
Growth of $10,000 invested in Value-Momentum on NSE vs Sensex from 2000 to 2025.

Full period summary (2004-2025):

Metric Value-Momentum Sensex (^BSESN)
CAGR 15.69%
Total Return 4,016%
Max Drawdown -61.63%
Volatility 28.98%
Sharpe Ratio 0.317
Sortino Ratio 0.637
Up Capture 109.7% 100%
Down Capture 61.76% 100%
Beta 0.771 1.0
Alpha 5.45%
Win Rate 58.82%
Cash Periods 9 of 51
Avg Stocks 29.3

$10,000 invested at the start would have grown to roughly $412,000. The 61.76% down capture means that when the Sensex fell, this portfolio absorbed about three-fifths of the decline. Combined with 109.7% up capture, the strategy participated fully in rallies while providing meaningful downside cushioning.

Value-Momentum India vs Sensex annual returns from 2000 to 2025.
Value-Momentum India vs Sensex annual returns from 2000 to 2025.

Year-by-year results:

Year Value-Momentum Sensex Notes
2000 0.00% -25.23% Cash
2001 0.00% -18.65% Cash
2002 0.00% +2.93% Cash
2003 0.00% +79.09% Cash
2004 +39.38% +10.83% First invested year
2005 +34.04% +40.59%
2006 +32.09% +48.48%
2007 +70.94% +46.79% Pre-crisis peak
2008 -61.63% -51.34% Max drawdown
2009 +107.78% +76.32% Strongest recovery year
2010 +13.58% +17.10%
2011 -23.61% -24.53%
2012 +36.46% +27.04%
2013 +5.45% +5.96%
2014 +63.16% +33.51% Modi election rally
2015 +9.28% -8.12%
2016 +13.52% +3.79%
2017 +57.69% +27.14% GST, broad bull market
2018 -19.20% +6.15%
2019 -7.15% +15.98%
2020 +18.13% +15.74%
2021 +59.42% +22.85% India post-COVID boom
2022 +11.32% +3.35% Positive while markets fell
2023 +82.68% +17.53% Best year
2024 +9.78% +11.20%
2025 -2.61% +4.34% YTD

Key Observations

2023 was the standout year. +82.68% in a single year. India's mid-cap universe exploded that year. The Nifty Midcap 100 was up over 40%. A concentrated 30-stock portfolio of value names with strong momentum amplified that. The strategy's P/E < 20 filter kept it out of overheated growth stocks and into the value names that led the rally.

The asymmetry is real, if not extreme. 58.82% win rate, 110% up capture, 62% down capture. That combination produced 5.45% annual alpha vs the Sensex. India's value universe includes consumer staples, private banks, and industrials that grow with the domestic economy. The value filter (P/E < 20) keeps the portfolio away from speculative names that crash hardest, though the downside protection is less dramatic when measured against the local index than against a foreign benchmark.

2008 was brutal, 2009 was the payoff. The -61.63% drawdown is the worst of any year. But the portfolio returned +107.78% the following year. Value stocks with strong balance sheets (D/E < 1.0) survived the crash and were the first to recover. If you held through the drawdown, you were whole within 18 months.

Limitations

Returns are in INR. The Indian rupee depreciated roughly 60% against the US dollar over this period. International investors would see meaningfully lower returns after currency conversion. Indian investors would see the full 15.69% CAGR.

9 cash periods. All in 2000-2003, when FMP coverage of Indian stocks was sparse. The effective backtest starts in 2004. The headline CAGR includes those flat years.

-61.63% max drawdown is severe. Even with 62% down capture over the full period, the 2008 crash hit hard. India had large foreign institutional inflows during the 2004-2007 bull market that reversed sharply. You need the ability to hold through a 62% drawdown to capture the subsequent recovery.

Transaction costs are size-tiered (0.1-0.5% one-way). Indian equities have STT (securities transaction tax), GST on brokerage, and exchange charges. These are modeled as size-tiered costs and reduce raw returns.

Takeaway

Value-momentum on Indian stocks produced 15.69% CAGR with 5.45% annual alpha vs the Sensex over 21 years of effective data. The 62% down capture shows the strategy provides meaningful, if not extreme, downside cushioning against the local market. The market's structural composition, dominated by domestically oriented consumer, financial, and industrial companies that pass value screens, creates a natural buffer during drawdowns.

The 2008 drawdown and INR depreciation are the honest caveats. This is a strong result for rupee-denominated investors who can tolerate the volatility.

Part of a Series


Data: Ceta Research. FMP financial data warehouse, 2000-2025.